Allegedly Prince Harry is not his father’s real son. Luckily, it is just another untrue and silly rumor about members of the royal family.
The Globe claims that Prince Charles disowned his youngest son after it was „revealed the renegade redhead isn’t really a member of the royal family.“ Tabloid meantioned a furious fight between the father and son, and the possibility of tearing apart the monarchy. Magazine even quoted from an unauthorized source that: „Harry and his wife, Meghan, have been banned from family gatherings. They’re disowned, and Charles is insisting he did not sire Harry… The Prince of Wales claims red-haired former royal bodyguard Mark Dyer is the real father.“
It was also claimed that everything started because of Markle’s „bizarre behaviour“. During the argument, Prince Charles told Prince Harry: „I’m not your father… and I have the DNA tests to prove it.“
The self proclaimed source added: „Mark is often referred to as Harry’s mentor and second father, but he’s much more. Mark is Harry’s real dad.“
These fake allegations were made already one year ago by another magazine, the National Enquirer, and it had been proven that the story was not true.
The main reason for the fake claims was Harry’s red hair. The truth is that Harry got his blue eyes, long nose, and jutting ears from Prince Charles. And Prince Harry looks like a younger version of his father. Harry even resembles his grandfather, Prince Philip, since he looks exactly like Philip did in 1957.
It is not a rare thing for royals to be victims of fake allegations. Many other fake news about royals, including Prince Harry having a secret „love child“, the Queen Elizabeth collapsing after Markle started a royal war over Christmas, Prince William accusing Prince Charles of murder, the Queen collapsing after the news about Prince Philip’s cancer, were published by the Globe, so this is just one of them.